- Home
- All Practice Areas
- Personal Injury
- Fort Worth Personal Injury Attorney
- What is a Personal Injury?
- Statute of Limitations
- Types of Personal Injury
- Damages in a Personal Injury Case
- Denied Insurance Claims
- Do I Really Need an Attorney?
- Mediation in a Personal Injury Case
- Personal Injury Claim Eligibility
- Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Premises Liability Accidents
- Slip & Fall Accidents
- Fort Worth Burn Injury Attorney
- Ft Worth Personal Injury Lawyer
- More...
- Thin Skull Rules
- Vicarious Liability
- Fort Worth Law Firms
- What is Subrogation?
- Mansfield Personal Injury Lawyer
- Arlington Personal Injury Lawyer
- Proving Proximate Cause
- Burleson Personal Injury Attorney
- Preponderance of Evidence
- Fort Worth Injury Attorney
- NRH Personal Injury Lawyer
- Your Duty to Mitigate Damages
- Fort Worth Attorneys
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Attorneys in Fort Worth
- How an Injury Lawsuit Works
- Hurst Personal Injury Lawyer
- Euless Personal Injury Lawyer
- Wrongful Death
- Wrongful Death Lawyer in Ft. Worth
- Intentions of a Lawsuit
- Statute of Limitations
- Fatal Car Accidents
- Fatal Work Accidents
- Fatal Construction Accidents
- Mansfield Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Texas Wrongful Death Attorney
- Burleson Wrongful Death Lawyer
- HEB Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Loss of Future Earnings
- Wrongful Death in the Workplace
- NRH Wrongful Death Lawyer
- Fort Worth Wrongful Deaths
- Car Accidents
- Fort Worth Auto Injury Attorney
- Fatal Automobile Accidents
- Common Car Accident Injuries
- Important Car Accident Info
- Child & Infant Accident Injury
- Injury to a Passenger
- Proportionate Responsibility
- Fort Worth Accident Injury Lawyer
- Rollover Accidents
- Auto Accident in Fort Worth
- Bedford Car Accident Lawyer
- Tire Defects & Blowouts
- Mansfield Car Accident Lawyer
- Euless Car Accident Lawyer
- Fort Worth Accident Lawyer
- Hurst Car Accident Lawyer
- More...
- 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Fort Worth Truck Accident Attorney
- Commercial Vehicle Accidents
- Insurance Company Tricks
- Fatal Truck Accidents
- Common Truck Accident Causes
- Flatbed Truck Accidents
- Accidents Caused by Truck Cargo
- Mansfield Truck Accident Lawyer
- Unsafe Trucking Practices
- Dump Truck Accidents
- Fatal 18-Wheeler Accidents
- Burleson Truck Accident Lawyer
- More...
- Fort Worth Truck Law Firm
- HEB Truck Accident Lawyer
- Fort Worth Big Rig Accident Attorney
- Fort Worth Trucking Accident Attorney
- NRH Truck Accident Lawyer
- Kennedale 18-Wheeler Accidents
- HEB 18-Wheeler Accident Attorney
- Burleson 18-Wheeler Accidents
- NRH 18-Wheeler Accident Lawyer
- Fort Worth Truck Accident Lawyer
- Ft. Worth 18-Wheeler Wrecks
- Drunken Driver Accidents
- Work Accidents
- Fort Worth Work Injury Lawyer
- Fatal Workplace Accidents
- Workers' Comp Vs. Non-Subscribers
- Non-Subscriber Work Injury
- Oilfield Worker Injury
- Ft. Worth Workers' Compensation Attorney
- Workers' Comp Lawyer in Fort Worth
- Burleson Work Injury Attorney
- Ft. Worth Non-Subscriber Attorney
- HEB Work Injury Lawyer
- Fort Worth Drilling Accident Lawyer
- Mansfield Work Injury Lawyer
- NRH Work Injury Attorney
- Fort Worth Work Accidents
- Fort Worth Workmans Comp
- Construction Accidents
- Medical Malpractice
- Other Vehicle Accidents
- Defective Products
- Drowning Accidents
- Prescription Drug Injury
- Birth Injury
- Daycare Child Abuse
- Personal Injury
- Meet Our Attorneys
- Our Successes
- Information Center
- Contact Us
Fort Worth Product Defect Attorney
Injury Lawyer Michael Grossman Explains the Basics of Product Liability Law in Fort Worth Texas

It is strongly advised not to initiate a complicated product liability case without an experienced Fort Worth product defect attorney on your team. You will most always be going up against a huge manufacturing conglomerate whose first and foremost concern is profitably. These corporations will have a small army of attorneys on their staff who will be directed to us every trick at their disposal to either have your case dismissed or at least paid out at a minimal rate.
Our US laws require that the companies that make products for our use take all necessary steps to ensure that the product is safe for consumer use. This applies to any type of product: fireworks, clothing, baby cribs, automobile tires, or any other product imaginable. If a product is defective or is unsafe and if a consumer is injured then those who have been injured have the legal right to pursue compensation for their injuries.
There are two major types of product liability categories:
- Negligence
- Strict Liability
Negligence Product Liability Claims
- Negligence is the design of the product
- Negligence in the manufacturing of the product
If a product has been designed without proper regard to the safety and possible dangers that may arise through its use then that manufacturer may be held liable for any injuries that occur.
In other cases a product may have been designed properly but the manufacturer may have cut corners in the manufacturing process to save on costs; if that product ends up injuring someone because of the use of inferior materials or building methodologies then the victim may sue the manufacturer for damages.
In addition, manufacturers have the responsibility of warning the public about any possible dangers associated with the use of their product. They may be held liable if they fail to communicate this to the public. One example of this could be if a patient took a new dose of medication and then developed a severe stomach ache. If that were not specifically mentioned on the medications packaging as a possible side effect then the manufacturer could be held as liable for any consequent injuries.
Strict Liability Claims
No negligent action on the part of the manufacturer is required in order to file a strict liability claim. A product may be inherently unsafe even if it the design, the materials used and the manufacturing process have all been top notch. If a product is inherently unsafe and if that product then injures a consumer then the victim may hold the manufacturer liable. An excellent example of this may be found in the game called “Lawn Darts.” In this game, kids were directed to toss sharp, metal-tipped darts into the air and towards each other on the lawn. It does not matter if these darts were designed perfectly, then built with the best materials and in the best manner possible; it is clear that the actual product was exceptionally dangerous in the hands of its intended market.
Grossman Law Offices Can Help

The Fort Worth product defect attorneys at Grossman Law Offices have been successfully litigating defective product liability cases for over 20 years. Over that period of time we have recovered compensation for our Texas clients from major manufacturers and their insurance companies throughout the United States. We have the reputation, the knowledge and the hard-won experience necessary to ensure that these huge corporations will take your injuries and your case very, very seriously. We will fight to make sure that you receive every penny to which you are entitled.
If you or a family member has been injured because of a defective or unsafe product then contact the Fort Worth Lawyers at Grossman Law Offices today at 1-855-357-2207 (toll-free). We are available 24 hours a day and are pleased to offer a complimentary consultation. Our Fort Worth product defect attorneys are looking forward to discussing your case with you and to answering all your specific questions.
Some of Our Most Recent Successful Cases
$3,200,000.00 Recovery - Wrongful Death / Automobile Accident
Our attorneys were hired to represent the family of a middle aged woman who was killed in a car accident. The incident occurred as another vehicle struck the car that the decedent was a passenger in, head-on on the passenger side. The impact resulted in catastrophic injuries which claimed the life of the decedent.
Our attorneys were hired soon after the accident and we launched a full investigation. Through the course of our investigation, it was soon determined that the head-on collision was caused a failed component in the defendant's vehicle (the particulars of which cannot be elaborated upon per the resolution agreement). Suit was filed against the manufacturer of said component and litigation commenced. The case was successfully resolved through litigation.
Our attorneys were hired to represent the family of a middle aged woman who was killed in a car accident. The incident occurred as another vehicle struck the car that the decedent was a passenger in, head-on on the passenger side. The impact resulted in catastrophic injuries which claimed the life of the decedent.
Our attorneys were hired soon after the accident and we launched a full investigation. Through the course of our investigation, it was soon determined that the head-on collision was caused a failed component in the defendant's vehicle (the particulars of which cannot be elaborated upon per the resolution agreement). Suit was filed against the manufacturer of said component and litigation commenced. The case was successfully resolved through litigation.
Total Recovery:
$3,200,000.00
$3,200,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$1,280,000.00
$1,280,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
$350,000.00 Recovery - Product Liability (Back Injury Resulting in Surgery)
A young woman suffered a back injury that required corrective surgery following a boating accident. The boat in question sped out of control and crashed into a landmass, throwing our client from the boat, as the result of a stuck throttle. Upon inspection of the boat, it was determined that a poor design led to the malfunction and a product liability lawsuit was brought against the manufacturer. The defendants argued that the boat was inappropriately piloted, however, the physical evidence depicted the cause of the accident quite clearly and the case was successfully resolved.
A young woman suffered a back injury that required corrective surgery following a boating accident. The boat in question sped out of control and crashed into a landmass, throwing our client from the boat, as the result of a stuck throttle. Upon inspection of the boat, it was determined that a poor design led to the malfunction and a product liability lawsuit was brought against the manufacturer. The defendants argued that the boat was inappropriately piloted, however, the physical evidence depicted the cause of the accident quite clearly and the case was successfully resolved.
Total Recovery:
$350,000.00
$350,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$100.00
$100.00
$70,000.00 Recovery - Product Liability Accident (Minor Burns)
Recovered for client who suffered minor burns due to an electrical transformer malfunction.
Recovered for client who suffered minor burns due to an electrical transformer malfunction.
Total Recovery:
$70,000.00
$70,000.00
Attorney Fees:
$28,000.00
$28,000.00
Litigation Expenses:
$313.00
$313.00



